The Synoptics and John

If you read Matthew, Mark, and Luke in a row, you get a “haven’t I read this before” feeling, because they are so similar to each other. In many places, they even have identical wording! For this reason, Bible scholars lump them together with the term “synoptic gospels.” The word “synoptic” means “together see,” because together, they see Jesus’ ministry pretty much the same way.

We call Matthew, Mark, and Luke the synoptics so we don’t have to say “Matthew, Mark, and Luke” over and over again.

The synoptics show Jesus’ ministry from the outside, while John gives us the inside story. The synoptics evangelize lay people; John equips the clergy to shepherd them.

The synoptic gospels follow Jesus’ deeds as He moves briskly from one activity to the next, speaking mainly to the public in aphorisms and parables that are hard to grasp. He moves so quickly that His disciples can scarcely keep the pace, let alone grasp the implications of what He is teaching. In John, the pace is more relaxed. Jesus speaks mainly to His disciples, expounding his teachings in longer discourses, without parables.

The synoptics relate Jesus’ teachings and the events of His ministry, while John explains what it all means. The synoptics describe Jesus’ exorcisms so that we may ponder what authority Jesus must have, if He can exorcise without invoking God. They show Jesus forgiving sins against God, which only God can forgive, leading us right up to the brink of Jesus’ deity, but not going much beyond. John, instead, omits the exorcisms and dives right into the discussions about Jesus’ preexistence, deity, and authority that would have necessarily taken place among the disciples after these events occurred.

The synoptics’ primary concern seems to be the effect of Jesus’ ministry on the public, with the ramifications that had for the disciples, while John’s primary concern is to reveal what went on within the group when Jesus and the disciples were alone. The synoptics show Jesus’ ministry from the outside, while John gives us the inside story.

The synoptics presume a theological background more than they teach it; they identify Jesus within the theology of the synagogue as the Messiah, while honing, sharpening, and correcting that concept only a little. John goes into much more explanatory detail, teaching the preexistence of Jesus Christ with God before creation and showing Him conscious of it. In the synoptics, Jesus presents the basic outline of His teachings to the public, so that His disciples can fill out the details later. In John, Jesus gives them those details in private. The synoptics speak in the external language of synagogue worship, but John speaks the internal language of Palestinian Jewish sages. The synoptics show Jesus’ ministry from the outside, while John gives us the inside story.

The public consists of lay people, while the disciples are clergy-in-training. Therefore we can say that the synoptics are concerned with the discipleship and spirituality of the laity, stressing fundamental things they must believe and do, while John plunges into the deeper discipleship and spirituality of the clergy, who must not only believe and obey, but also understand why, so they can guide the laity.

In the synoptics, we find Jesus requiring that the leaders be servants of the rank and file; in John, He equips them explicitly for this task. In John, faith involves a greater intellectual investment and obedience is not possible without careful reflection. For in the synoptics, it is sufficient to trust Jesus and obey His commandments, but in John we must contemplate the implications of the incarnate God. Again, the synoptics show Jesus’ ministry from the outside, while John gives us the inside story.

The primary value of the synoptics is in its emphasis on the laity, presenting Jesus’ words and deeds in terms the readers can understand, while perhaps spoofing the clergy from time to time to keep them humble and to remind the laity that they must take initiative. The primary value of John is to equip the clergy by developing the philosophical, ethical, and theological themes that the synoptics only mention.

Both the synoptics and John have historical value. Since the synoptics focus on external events, their primary historical value is in locating Jesus within the context of historical events. At first blush, John does not seem to have any historical value at all, since he deals with teachings rather than events. Since we find that John is intimately acquainted with Palestinian geography, so we cannot dismiss its historical authenticity out of hand. The Dead Sea Scrolls demonstrate that John’ theology fits very well within first-century Judaism, which was more diverse than we used to think. John’s historical value is not in fixing dates and events, but in locating Jesus and the early Christian kerygma within the theological and philosophical context of first-century Judaism.

The early church was very wise to include both the synoptics and John in the canon of the New Testament. Without John, the clergy would be at a loss to deal with many pastoral situations that result from lay people testing and trying the discipleship that Jesus requires in the synoptics. Without the synoptics, lay people would find their discipleship stymied by theological riddles. Without John, the Christian community would be well equipped to evangelize, but would be hampered in its ability to manage itself after the converts came in the door. Without the synoptics, the Christian community would be well maintained, but it would find growth difficult. So the synoptics are the gospel of the outside, the gospel of evangelism, the gospel of the external public face, and the gospel that equips the laity, while John is the gospel of the inside, the gospel of reflection and discernment, the gospel of the internal private face, and the gospel that equips the clergy.

As an individual Christian, I find that the synoptics help me live in obedience in the world, while John helps me live in faith within my soul. The synoptics tell me what to do, and John tells me why.

You Might Also Like:

The Art and Agony of Translation

1 John 5:7-8 reads differently in the King James Version than in other translations because Erasmus lost a bet. If you compare this verse in the King James Version, you will find a Trinitarian formula (“the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one” ) that does not appear in mos...
Read More

Translations of the Bible Into English

You decide to buy yourself or someone else a Bible, so you run down to the nearest bookstore—but they have so many different translations, you don’t know where to begin. Here is something that might help: a list of modern translations that you are likely to find in a bookstore, with a description of...
Read More

About Those ‘Literal’ Translations

Every so often, someone writes to ask me about some obscure Bible translation, and invariably they add, ‘it is supposed to be a literal translation.’ For me, this is a red flag. Let me explain. New Testament Greek is quite a different language from English, and a strictly literal translation is impo...
Read More

The Nicene Creed and the New Testament Canon

The New Testament and the Nicene Creed are deeply entangled with each other. The wording and the concepts in the Nicene Creed come from the New Testament—in fact, one of the most important debates at the Council of Nicea concerned whether it is proper to include a word in the Nicene Creed that does ...
Read More

The Torah in Modern Scholarship

The first five books of the Bible are called the Torah by Jews and the Pentateuch by scholars. The word ‘Torah’ is Hebrew for ‘teaching’ or ‘law,’ and the word ‘Pentateuch’ is Greek for ‘five books.’ Sometimes scholars include the book of Joshua and term the collection the ‘Hexateuch,’ which means ‘...
Read More

The Apocrypha and the Old Testament

Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.—Proverbs 30:5-6, NIV The canon of scripture—that is, the official list of what’s in the Bible—is not revealed to us by any saying of Jesus, nor does scr...
Read More

New Testament Scholarship

The Insufficiency of Literary Analysis Unaccompanied by Other Tools New Testament critics generally assume that our gospels are the product of a scribe having two or more editions before him, which he takes together to produce a new version that contains material from the old sources. They say this,...
Read More

Leviticus For Christians

A few interesting laws from Leviticus, which at first glance don’t seem to concern us today: Forbidden leftovers When you sacrifice a fellowship offering to the LORD, sacrifice it in such a way that it will be accepted on your behalf. It shall be eaten on the day you sacrifice it or on the next day;...
Read More

Slavery and Sonship

Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.”—John 8:34-36, NIV Notice that Jesus has the slave living in the house, albeit temporari...
Read More

Are There Contradictions in the Bible?

You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise yo...
Read More

The Rescue of Lot

The story of the destruction of Sodom and its sister city of Gomorrah is of compelling interest today because of the current debate in the churches over homosexuality. In the course of this debate, these two chapters of Genesis have been degraded from a story of God’s justice and providence to a dia...
Read More

Evolution and Creationism

Why does water boil? Fred and Ethel have different explanations. Fred says that heat causes the vapor pressure within the water to rise to the same level as the atmospheric pressure on its surface. That causes bubbles to form, which rise and break the surface.Ethel says that’s nonsense. The water wa...
Read More

Reading What Isn't There

“Judge others, but you are exempt from judgment. You must go out and tell it like it is, exposing sinners wherever you find them. You will receive a special bonus for each evil you expose.”—Matthew 7:1-2, Reversed Fractured Version “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you ju...
Read More

Wrong Impressions

Do you have a regular Bible study plan? Well, I’m so glad to hear that! You don’t? Well, maybe that is not so bad. You know, a lot of people who have a regular Bible reading plan are very systematic about it. Certainly you’ve met the type: they read a chapter a day, or some other arbitrary amount. I...
Read More

But Is it Biblical?

Recently I helped my boss decode a rather obtuse document, in which the writer had used obscure words instead of plain language. “This is,” I said, “an example of what happens when people go to the dictionary for permission instead of guidance,” and my boss thought that was an astute observation. Ju...
Read More

The Bible and Personal Revelation

God reveals Himself to us in nature, for Scripture says: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.Their voice goes out in...
Read More

The Inspiration of the Bible

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.—2 Timothy 3:16-17, NIV Someone recently asked if I consider the Bible the inspired and inerrant word of God or if I fee...
Read More

Interpreting the Bible

When I work on interpreting Scriptural texts, I work through these layers: The probable meaning of the writer, which has to fit in with the writer’s environment.If it is an Old Testament text, the way the passage has been used and interpreted historically in Judaism.The way the passage has been used...
Read More