But Is it Biblical?

Recently I helped my boss decode a rather obtuse document, in which the writer had used obscure words instead of plain language. “This is,” I said, “an example of what happens when people go to the dictionary for permission instead of guidance,” and my boss thought that was an astute observation. Just because the word chiaroscuro is in the dictionary, for example, it doesn’t mean that anyone is edified or informed when you use it in a sentence. I’m sure you’ve read documents where it seems the writer’s primary purpose was not to convey a message, but to see how stupid he could make you feel.

Some people seem to use the Bible for permission instead of guidance. Instead of learning what the Bible has to teach them, they use the Bible to justify their pet notions. They say their ideas are biblical, and in an invalid sense they are right, but their notions are read into the Bible rather than out of the Bible.

Here some of my personal standards for making sure that a ‘biblical teaching’ is in truly biblical.

It must be historical

Jesus does not say:

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell will overcome it for a while, but in the nineteenth century it will be restored.
—Matthew 16:18, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, the Church has always been present:

And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell will not overcome it.
—Matthew 16:18, NIV

Unless Jesus is a false prophet, the gates of hell never overcame the Church. So that means that if I am on the right track, I must be able to find theologians in all ages who agree with me. If my idea was mainly advanced by heretics, that’s a big red flag. If there was a period in Christian history before my notion was known, then I have to ask myself, “Why did God hide this great truth from the apostles and disclose it personally to me?” If that question does not seem absurd, then instead of a podium and a microphone, I need a psychiatrist and a social worker.

Jesus does not say:

Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: “The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat, but they do not practice what they preach. So you must disobey them and show them for the frauds they really are.”
—Matthew 23:1-3, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, even hypocrites can be good teachers:

Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples: “The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat. So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.”
—Matthew 23:1-3, NIV

One thing I have learned the hard way is that if you are not a good musician, getting a better instrument won’t help. On the other hand, even a lousy instrument sounds good when a master plays it. So we see how God can transmit His truth even through a flawed Church. We see this in the startling fact that even while Luther was being pushed out of the Roman Catholic Church, the pope himself commended Luther’s theological writings! No matter whose side we take in that dispute, it is clear that orthodoxy persists despite it all. We must heed the Holy Spirit’s testimony through the saints of the historic Church.

It must be practical

Paul does not say:

I know that this man—whether in the body or apart of the body I do not know, but God knows—was caught up to paradise. He heard some special truths, truths that he can only tell to special elite Christians.
—2 Corinthians 12:3-4, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, esoteric or secret doctrines are most likely bogus:

I know that this man—whether in the body or apart of the body I do not know, but God knows—was caught up to paradise. He heard inexpressible things, things that man is not permitted to tell.
—2 Corinthians 12:3-4, NIV

Throughout the New Testament, we learn that there are things we are simply not allowed to know. I notice that Jesus seeks to save our soul, but heretics seek to impress us with their wisdom. There are lots of people who use the Bible as an intellectual Swiss Army knife to solve all mysteries and settle all disputes, but Jesus is not one of them. Jesus’ interest is in saving my soul, not satisfying my curiosity.

Jesus does not say:

Whoever says to me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven, not just the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?” Then I will tell them plainly, “How nice of you to go to the extra trouble, but the important thing is that you understand the way of salvation!”
—Matthew 7:21-23, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, whoever has faith with their mind by believing must also have faith with their body by obeying:

Not everyone who says to me, “Lord, Lord,” will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, “Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?” Then I will tell them plainly, “I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!”
—Matthew 7:21-23, NIV

Therefore, any theological notion that has no practical value in bringing people to faith or perfecting their obedience is pointless. When Jesus returns, He will commend our service, not our sophistry, so I am leery of any theological notion that does not produce obedience.

It must be pastoral

John does not say:

Whoever does not master theology, does not know God, because God is a clever guy.
—1 John 4:8, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, true spirituality bears fruit in the heart, not necessarily the intellect:

Whoever does not love, does not know God, because God is love.
—1 John 4:8, NIV

There are people who tell it like it is, who set the world straight about sin, who let the chips fall where they may. They don’t mind if they offend people, claiming the people were convicted of sin. Above all else, they don’t want to be soft on sin. But Jesus said the Holy Spirit would convict the world of sin, and our job is to preach the good news, and that if we should cause even the least of His to stumble, it would be better for us to wear concrete galoshes and sleep with the fishes. Jesus did not come to condemn the world, but to rescue it, and if we are His followers, we should be rescuing people with our love, not haranguing them with our insecurities.

John does not say:

For God so hated the world that he gave his only begotten Son, so that the good people shall not perish but have eternal life. For God sent his Son into the world to condemn the world, and to airlift his little ones out of this evil world order.
—John 3:16-17, Reversed Fractured Version

In truth, God loves that evil world you live in:

For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.
—John 3:16-17, NIV

God is love; God is light and there is no shadow within Him. Jesus died to save sinners, not to judge them. Correct theology gathers, it does not scatter; it attracts, it does not repel; it edifies, it does not deflate; it calls to action, it does not call to slumber; it lifts sinners up, it does not put them down. So if someone preaches a bogeyman theology, it is at best the truth wrongly presented, and at worst it is the lie that Jesus is not triumphant and that Satan is not defeated.

Therefore, I do not consider a teaching to be biblical until it passes these tests:

  • It appears in all parts of Church history and in the mainstream.
  • It moves me to service, as well as contemplation.
  • It equips me to help others.
  • It emphasizes Jesus’ work, not Satan’s work.

You Might Also Like:

The Art and Agony of Translation

1 John 5:7-8 reads differently in the King James Version than in other translations because Erasmus lost a bet. If you compare this verse in the King James Version, you will find a Trinitarian formula (“the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one” ) that does not appear in mos...
Read More

Translations of the Bible Into English

You decide to buy yourself or someone else a Bible, so you run down to the nearest bookstore—but they have so many different translations, you don’t know where to begin. Here is something that might help: a list of modern translations that you are likely to find in a bookstore, with a description of...
Read More

About Those ‘Literal’ Translations

Every so often, someone writes to ask me about some obscure Bible translation, and invariably they add, ‘it is supposed to be a literal translation.’ For me, this is a red flag. Let me explain. New Testament Greek is quite a different language from English, and a strictly literal translation is impo...
Read More

The Nicene Creed and the New Testament Canon

The New Testament and the Nicene Creed are deeply entangled with each other. The wording and the concepts in the Nicene Creed come from the New Testament—in fact, one of the most important debates at the Council of Nicea concerned whether it is proper to include a word in the Nicene Creed that does ...
Read More

The Torah in Modern Scholarship

The first five books of the Bible are called the Torah by Jews and the Pentateuch by scholars. The word ‘Torah’ is Hebrew for ‘teaching’ or ‘law,’ and the word ‘Pentateuch’ is Greek for ‘five books.’ Sometimes scholars include the book of Joshua and term the collection the ‘Hexateuch,’ which means ‘...
Read More

The Apocrypha and the Old Testament

Every word of God is flawless; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.—Proverbs 30:5-6, NIV The canon of scripture—that is, the official list of what’s in the Bible—is not revealed to us by any saying of Jesus, nor does scr...
Read More

New Testament Scholarship

The Insufficiency of Literary Analysis Unaccompanied by Other Tools New Testament critics generally assume that our gospels are the product of a scribe having two or more editions before him, which he takes together to produce a new version that contains material from the old sources. They say this,...
Read More

The Synoptics and John

If you read Matthew, Mark, and Luke in a row, you get a “haven’t I read this before” feeling, because they are so similar to each other. In many places, they even have identical wording! For this reason, Bible scholars lump them together with the term “synoptic gospels.” The word “synoptic” means “t...
Read More

Leviticus For Christians

A few interesting laws from Leviticus, which at first glance don’t seem to concern us today: Forbidden leftovers When you sacrifice a fellowship offering to the LORD, sacrifice it in such a way that it will be accepted on your behalf. It shall be eaten on the day you sacrifice it or on the next day;...
Read More

Slavery and Sonship

Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.”—John 8:34-36, NIV Notice that Jesus has the slave living in the house, albeit temporari...
Read More

Are There Contradictions in the Bible?

You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden. Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead, they put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise yo...
Read More

The Rescue of Lot

The story of the destruction of Sodom and its sister city of Gomorrah is of compelling interest today because of the current debate in the churches over homosexuality. In the course of this debate, these two chapters of Genesis have been degraded from a story of God’s justice and providence to a dia...
Read More

Evolution and Creationism

Why does water boil? Fred and Ethel have different explanations. Fred says that heat causes the vapor pressure within the water to rise to the same level as the atmospheric pressure on its surface. That causes bubbles to form, which rise and break the surface.Ethel says that’s nonsense. The water wa...
Read More

Reading What Isn't There

“Judge others, but you are exempt from judgment. You must go out and tell it like it is, exposing sinners wherever you find them. You will receive a special bonus for each evil you expose.”—Matthew 7:1-2, Reversed Fractured Version “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you ju...
Read More

Wrong Impressions

Do you have a regular Bible study plan? Well, I’m so glad to hear that! You don’t? Well, maybe that is not so bad. You know, a lot of people who have a regular Bible reading plan are very systematic about it. Certainly you’ve met the type: they read a chapter a day, or some other arbitrary amount. I...
Read More

The Bible and Personal Revelation

God reveals Himself to us in nature, for Scripture says: The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands.Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they display knowledge.There is no speech or language where their voice is not heard.Their voice goes out in...
Read More

The Inspiration of the Bible

All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.—2 Timothy 3:16-17, NIV Someone recently asked if I consider the Bible the inspired and inerrant word of God or if I fee...
Read More

Interpreting the Bible

When I work on interpreting Scriptural texts, I work through these layers: The probable meaning of the writer, which has to fit in with the writer’s environment.If it is an Old Testament text, the way the passage has been used and interpreted historically in Judaism.The way the passage has been used...
Read More