The History Of Biblical Criticism

A careful study of the history of Biblical Criticism will demonstrate that this discipline has its roots in attempts to overthrow the authority of the Bible in the late sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, particularly in France, where the libertines challenged the Christian consensus that prevailed almost universally in Europe at that time.1 For example, Baruch Spinoza (1632-1677), in his Tractatus-theologico-politicus (1670), sought to find contradictions in the Pentateuch in order to undermine the prevailing viewpoint of the Bible as infallible.

He also stated that the Pentateuch could not have been written by Moses because it refers to him in the third person, and it records his own death. These arguments are still used by those who adhere to the Documentary hypothesis, and had their origin in Spinoza's work.

Spinoza and others began asserting that reason, not revelation, is the principal criterion to be used in the determination of truth, and that reason should therefore be used to sift what was truthful out of the Bible.

Another early father of Biblical criticism was Hugo Grotius, who attempted to examine the Biblical documents in their appropriate historical contexts in the light of "reason," and to conjecture about their emendation, with very little concern for the Biblical claims themselves. In the latter portion of the seventeenth century, Jean LeClerc used these ideas for his more radical criticism of the Biblical texts. LeClerc stated that, except for the prophetical writings of the Bible and the teachings of Christ, the Bible consisted of historical accounts or moral lessons, but were not inspired by God. The Gospels, for example, although not inspired, were reliable historical documents. These ideas became very prevalent during the Enlightenment and were the foundation upon which modern higher Biblical criticism was built. Yet, as we have seen, they are incompatible with the claims of the Scriptures themselves.

1 John D. Woodbridge, Biblical Authority (Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan Corporation, 1982), pp. 85-86.

You Might Also Like:

Christian Evidences related image
Read More

Christian Evidences

Christian evidences refer to the various arguments, facts, and historical data that support the truth claims of Christianity. These evidences are used by Christians to demonstrate the validity of their faith and to defend it against skeptics and critics. One of the most important pieces of evidence ...
Read More

Why The Bible Cannot Be Legend

Everybody knows that all historical events are interrelated. They have observable consequences in the real world. Whenever it is asserted that something has happened in the past, we can always test the assertion by determining whether or not subsequent events are best explained by it. For example, i...
Read More

The Historical Trustworthiness Of The Bible

The trustworthiness of the Bible's historical statements has been corroborated again and again both through archaeological discoveries and through close correlation of the Bible's content with other independent ancient sources. A comprehensive study of this topic would be far beyond the scope of the...
Read More

Archaeology And The Bible

The subject of Biblical archaeology is a vast one, so it will be necessary to confine comments here to only a few of the multitude of cases in which archaeological discoveries have vindicated Biblical claims. At many times in the past, scholars have assumed the Bible to be inaccurate until new archa...
Read More

Confirmations Of The Bible

Heretics, Jews, pagans, and Christians all inadvertently confirm the trustworthiness of the Bible by their incidental references to many of the same things to which the Bible refers. One of the most exhaustive studies of this topic was done by Thomas S. Millington, in his book, The Testimony of the ...
Read More

The Verifiability Of History

In a previous chapter, "Why The Bible Cannot Be Legend," it was shown that because everything that happens has both consequences and a definite context, it is possible to determine whether or not a given historical account is trustworthy. This is especially clear in the historical accounts of the li...
Read More

The Long Day Of Joshua

One of the evidences for the historicity of the long day recorded in Joshua 10:13 and reiterated in Habakkuk 3:11 lies in the large body of traditions from many parts of the world according to which there was a long day (or night, or evening, depending upon the location) at about the same time that ...
Read More

Jonah

Many people feel that the account given in the Bible of Jonah is legendary, since even if there were a fish big enough to swallow a man, certainly no man would be able to survive three days in its digestive tract and then escape to the outside world. However, again and again, Jesus referred to this ...
Read More

The Fulfillment Of Prophecy

The fulfillment of the prophecies of the Bible is a vast subject. In fact, the Messianic prophecies alone have provided enough material for the publication of many books. Other books have been written solely about the Old Testament prophecies concerning certain cities or about certain world empires,...
Read More

Pitcairn's Island

The story of the Pitcairn Bible is a testimony both to the providence of God and to the value of the Bible in saving society from chaos. Ginny Hastings has written of it, "with no law to guide them, the mutineers of the Bounty turned an island paradise into a living hell of sexual abuse, drunkenness...
Read More

The Amazing Survival Of The Word Of God

No book has ever been the subject of more continued attacks upon it than the Bible. Despite the assaults mounted upon it for millennia, it has emerged unscathed. F. Bettex of Stuttgart, Germany has written: Unchanged and unchangeable, this Bible stands for centuries, unconcerned about the praise an...
Read More

Date and authenticity of the New Testament

In the early twentieth century, most scholars dated the New Testament documents as follows: Matthew, A.D. 851Mark, A.D. 60-652Luke, A.D. 80-853John, A.D. 90-954Pauline Epistles, A.D. 48-645For the four Gospels, these were the latest possible dates of authorship; there were excellent reasons for earl...
Read More

Manuscript Attestation Of The Old Testament

There are many important old manuscripts of the Old Testament. Until the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls, one of the most ancient of these was the Cairo Codex, containing the former and latter prophets, copied in A.D. 895 by Moses Ben Asher, a leader of the Masoretes, in Tiberias, Palestine. One o...
Read More

The Formation Of The Canon: The Old Testament

The Hebrew Scriptures were recognized as authoritative at their inception, and were immediately accepted as such by the Jewish people. The acceptance of the Pentateuch, for example, is recorded in Deuteronomy 32:46-47, and in Joshua 1:7,8. As a matter of course, the Church of the first century regar...
Read More

The Formation Of The Canon: The New Testament

The determination of the Canon of the New Testament was not the result of any pronouncement, either by an official of the Church or by an ecclesiastical body. Rather, the Canon was determined by the use of these books throughout all of the Churches during the first and second centuries. The establis...
Read More

Transmission Of The Bible

The accuracy of the present-day Hebrew version of the Old Testament is a result of the fastidious care with which the Sopherim and the Masoretes transmitted it. The Sopherim copied manuscripts of the Hebrew Scriptures from about 300 B.C. until A.D. 500. According to the Talmud, they came to be calle...
Read More

The Inspiration And Authority Of The Bible

In II Timothy 3:16, it is stated that "all Scripture is inspired by God." The Greek word , translated here "inspired by God," literally means "God-breathed." That is, the Scriptures are a product of the creative activity of the divine breath. As Alan Stibbs has observed, this "indicates that Scriptu...
Read More